Last month, the Copyright Office’s Review Board denied for the second time the application of the Union des associations européennes de Football (UEFA) for copyright registration in UEFA’s EURO Trophy. The Trophy is shown below: According to the Board, the Trophy’s overall shape is no different than standard Greek amphora, and thus “as a whole, … Continue Reading
In this 2018-19 term, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on an issue that has long divided copyright attorneys and the courts that hear their cases. Under the Copyright Law, Section 411(a), a copyright owner may not bring an infringement lawsuit until the copyright owner has registered the copyright with the U.S. Copyright … Continue Reading
Anyone with an internet connection can find copyrighted content to download—legally or illegally. But the Ninth Circuit has now held that the mere fact that a rightsholder can show an individual is connected to the IP address through which illegal downloading took place is not enough to make out a case for copyright infringement. In … Continue Reading
Cease and desist letters can serve as a warning ahead of full scale litigation, however there are some possible resolutions before ending up in court. Alicia Bell and Carla Quisenberry joined the Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association‘s Boiled Down podcast this week to discuss demand letters, how to avoid them, and your options if you … Continue Reading
In 1710, during the reign of Queen Anne, Great Britain’s Parliament enacted the statute that gave rise to copyright as we know it—the Statute of Anne—which was the first statute to declare that the subject matter of copyright would be regulated by the government and the courts, rather than agreements between private parties. Seven years … Continue Reading
Music City Metals (MCM) built a thriving business designing and selling replacement parts for name-brand BBQ grills. Too good, it turns out, as a number of foreign competitors also jumped into the game, copying MCM’s own replacement parts and selling those replacements for the replacements. While MCM thought it was fine to market itself as … Continue Reading
In the blockbuster case of Oracle v. Google, the Federal Circuit has once again questioned the role of juries in deciding technical issues, this time in the context of fair use of copyrighted software. Oracle sued Google in 2010 after acquiring Sun Microsystems, alleging that Google’s unauthorized use of 37 packages of Oracle’s Java application … Continue Reading
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides limited safe-harbor immunity from copyright infringement claims to certain types of websites and other online service providers. Earlier this year, we blogged regarding the need for such providers to now use an online portal to electronically designate an agent to receive take down requests and reported that all … Continue Reading
Can a cheerleader uniform containing combinations of elements like chevrons, lines, stripes, and angles be protected by copyright? Well, the Supreme Court addressed this exact issue on March 22, 2017, in the case of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. And, ta da, the answer is yes where a design feature of a useful article … Continue Reading
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides limited immunity from copyright infringement claims to certain types of websites and other online service providers. To qualify for such safe-harbor immunity, such providers must designate an agent to receive requests to remove infringing materials. As of December 1, 2016, the Copyright Offices now requires that such providers … Continue Reading
We go for months with nothing but the slightest right of publicity kerfuffle here and there; and then, in the space of less than two weeks, we get two major appellate decisions. Both the Eighth and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal recently handed down opinions in the ongoing balancing of individuals’ right of publicity against … Continue Reading
A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lenz v. Universal Music answered a question that it seems nobody has asked until now: Is it necessary to consider fair use before submitting a takedown notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)? The answer is an unequivocal yes, though copyright holders need only a … Continue Reading
By Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP on Posted in Copyright
Much has been written regarding the recent US Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. For a detailed background and analysis of the opinion, check out the SCOTUS blog summary. In short, the Court held that a US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision could give rise to issue preclusion in a later federal court … Continue Reading
Last week, in the case of Richemont International v. British Sky Broadcasting, a UK trial court issued a unique decision that ordered British ISPs to block access to websites that advertise and sell counterfeit luxury goods. The case was brought by the owners of such luxury brands as CARTIER and MONTBLANC. The trademark owners sought to … Continue Reading
Elizabeth Milesnick was recently interviewed on the Oregon Public Broadcasting’s program Think Out Loud about the recent Oracle copyright infringement claim concerning Cover Oregon software. To listen to the insightful interview, visit the Think Out Loud page on OPB’s website.… Continue Reading
Does a bankruptcy decree discharge all debts? For a discharge of debt from damages for copyright infringement, the answer is “not always.” A recent bankruptcy appellate court of the 8th circuit affirmed a district bankruptcy court that refused to discharge royalties due to copyright owners in bankruptcy. In re Walker, — B.R. —-, 2014 WL 3882494 … Continue Reading
Copyright protection lasts a long time, but it isn’t long enough for the estate of Arthur Conan Doyle, author of the well-known Sherlock Holmes books. Of the fifty novels and short stories written by Conan Doyle about the famous detective and his sidekick, Dr. Watson, forty have outlived their copyrights (which in this case, expired … Continue Reading
By Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP on Posted in Copyright
Question: What do you get when you cross a curious primate with an unattended camera? In addition to the beginning of a bad joke, a rather quirky question of copyright law. The story began when professional photographer David Slater brought thousands of dollars’ worth of photography equipment on the trip of a lifetime to Indonesia in … Continue Reading
In American Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a “technologically complex system” that permitted Aereo subscribers to view over-the-air TV signals infringed the copyrights of broadcasters. The Court found that Aereo’s system was engaged in transmitting copyrighted material to the public without a license. Aereo had created an innovative system … Continue Reading
Cuba is famous for cigars, and COHIBA brand cigars are arguably the most famous Cuban cigars in the world. But because of the Cuban embargo, COHIBA brand cigars cannot be legally sold or imported into the United States. But as recently decided by the Federal Circuit, the Cuban owners of the COHIBA mark still have a … Continue Reading
CafePress, the popular website that allows users to upload an image and then have that image printed onto a t-shirt, shower curtain, flask, or pretty much anything else you can imagine, was recently sued by an artist whose artwork was put onto several CafePress items without his consent. CafePress’s inability to get out of the … Continue Reading
In a unanimous decision announced today, the United States Supreme Court upheld an expansive interpretation of the false advertising prong of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. s. 1125(a)), which decision will allow a broader range of commercial interests to bring false advertising claims. As we reported earlier in this blog, the question asked of the Supreme … Continue Reading
Copyright protection is a relatively cheap and a very long term protection for works of authorship. But unfortunately, copyright protection in the United States generally does not cover the protection of useful items (think furniture, lamps, beverage bottles, now hookahs) unless the protectable work of authorship is either physically or conceptually separable from the useful article. This … Continue Reading
In Nashville, songwriters’ rights are protected vigorously, as the Nashville district court confirmed in Castronuovo v. Sony Music. There, the district court for the Middle District of Tennessee recently ruled in a dispute over the authorship of certain songs that, if a claim is not barred by the three-year statute of limitations for copyright actions (17 … Continue Reading
